I don`t like phones with touchscreens. The reason is simple: for me, a touchscreen doesn`t provide any advantage in terms of usability. I am way faster typing on my E71 than on my iphone. I don`t need to smear my fingers over the screen to enlage or browse my photos. A decent d-pad to scroll left or right and the volume keys to zoom in/out provide me with a fast, intuitive and reliable form of interacting with my phone. The same goes for browsing the web, scrolling through mails or any other activity.
But this is my personal taste. It all comes down to personal taste. I know some people who think different. For them, a touchscreen is a far better option. They like touchscreens.
I must think about this when I read that Nokia is “now coming with a vengeance” regarding phones with touchscreens. This all sounds so familiar…
Looking back several years, Nokia was missing the clamshell trend. Then there were sliders. Missed and later partly recovered. And after that, everything had to be as thin as possible because of the Razr. Missed and later partly recovered. Now touchscreens. Because of the iphone… My point is that there is nothing wrong with innovation and new ideas. Absolutely not. For some time, consumers like a certain form-factor or feature best. But the question is: what happens afterwards? Are there only clamshells or sliders or ultra-thin phones existing today? No. There is a healthy mix of all of them. Nokia missed these trends in the first place, but quickly slightly adjusted its strategy. It did hurt Nokia in the short term, but it suffered much less damage than Motorola with its tight focus on the Razr or Sony Ericsson and its focus on the walkman brand.
Of course, when a company gets it right, it can be a big big opportunity. In my opinion, the slider-trend really got started with the D500 and D600, at least in Germany. The D500 and D600 in general paved the road for Samsung big way. They also jumped quite successful on the everything-has-to-be-as-thin-as-possible trend with the ultra-series and now they are about to do the same with touchscreens. Kudos to Samsung for that. Others weren`t so lucky. Think Motorola.
Trends come and go. This doesn`t mean that a company should ignore them. Nokia should quite aggressively attack whenever there is a chance. So should do every company who will survive on the market. But they should not shift focus too much and therefore loose interest in other key-areas. Nokia is already fighting a war on multiple fronts. The transition to become a mobile computer company with a much greater emphasize on services is just one of them. Of course, Nokia is still the leading handset-manufacturer on this planet. But even Nokia`s resources are somewhat limited, even more in a time of recession.
Sony Ericsson is also facing problems on several fronts. But this another story.
So, at the moment, phones with touchscreens are considered the holy grail. They are about to stay, no question about that. But they won`t make all other phones disappear. This should not be forgotten. The trend will fade and give way to another trend. In the end, we all will have more choices. This is a good thing. Interesting times, nevertheless.